Why Joy Division?
Saturday, August 12th, 2006Last night I went to a bar in L.A. for the first time, I think, since we returned to the U.S. after a year in Spain.
I was only slightly surprised to hear two Joy Division songs within a span of 90 minutes (the first being “Ice Age” of all things.) Like anyone else monitoring “indie music” these past five years, I know Joy Division is back, and then some.
Likewise, as a 33 year-old, I can understand how this short-lived but highly influential band would end up on a nostalgia mix that also included Siouxsie & the Banshees, Guns & Roses, OMD, X and The Cure.
Got it. But here’s my question: Why? Why was Joy Division so influential? Why does that band and that sound still resonate in a Los Angeles bar filled with 25-35 year-olds? That is, with people likely born after the songs in question were written.
Clarity of sound and purpose, OK. Bold repurposing of familiar elements. Check. But there’s got to be more to it, I think.
(Or, maybe, I’m damaged goods: having heard and been shaped by this group’s songs at the age of 13, I can’t help but have a visceral reaction to Ian Curtis’ voice and lyrics, to the cold chamber in which the instruments were placed or the deceptive simplicity of the melodies.)
In which case, maybe I was having my own little listening party while others were thinking: “I wish they would play some Judas Priest.”

