{"id":2012,"date":"2010-03-11T19:02:51","date_gmt":"2010-03-12T02:02:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/xsml\/?p=2012"},"modified":"2010-03-11T19:02:51","modified_gmt":"2010-03-12T02:02:51","slug":"signals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/2010\/03\/11\/signals\/","title":{"rendered":"Signals."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I spent a few minutes this afternoon trying to figure out if there is ever an instance where a false signal is better than no signal at all. I couldn&#8217;t think of any. <\/p>\n<p>(I asked Ana, and she couldn&#8217;t either. In fact, she&#8217;s been waiting all week for a call from a prospective employer and she was quite sure that she&#8217;d rather continue waiting than be lied to about her getting the job.)<\/p>\n<p>An hour later I decided that my question was flawed. No signal is a kind of signal and one of three that can be ranked, from most to least desirable: <\/p>\n<p>1) true signal<br \/>\n2) no signal<br \/>\n3) false signal<\/p>\n<p>This sounds pretty abstract but it&#8217;s a common preoccupation. For example, New Edition&#8217;s song &#8220;Mr. Telephone Man&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMr. Telephone man<br \/>\nThere&#8217;s something wrong with my line,<br \/>\nWhen I dial my baby&#8217;s number<br \/>\nI get a click everytime\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The narrator is willfully misreading a true signal (click) as a false signal (she can&#8217;t really be hanging up on him) and brings in a third party to entertain the possibility that there&#8217;s no signal (something is wrong with his line.)<\/p>\n<p>In missing persons dramas on TV, grieving family members are often presented with a similar choice: they can accept a likely false signal &#8212; the discovery of unidentifiable remains &#8212; or they can stay in a state of indeterminacy with no sign of their missing loved one. <\/p>\n<p>This may be a false choice as both options have the same outcome: keeping the case open.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d rather believe a lie than not know&#8221; is a bit of a paradox. If you believe you&#8217;re being lied to, you know the truth of the matter is otherwise. Accepting a possible lie is a way to postpone the conclusion. It&#8217;s a way to bury the hope that one day the lie will be exposed by the arrival of the truth. What is presented as a way to &#8220;get closure,&#8221; is in fact quite the opposite. It&#8217;s a way to secretly keep the case open.<\/p>\n<p>So why not just accept the lack of a sign? What&#8217;s so bad about no signal? Like the Telephone Man in the New Edition song, the families in missing persons dramas turn to a third party, the police, to establish the truth. Perhaps, it&#8217;s just too disappointing to accept that these arbiters of truth are unable to solve the case?<\/p>\n<p>The worst possible outcome then is for the police to conclude there&#8217;s no signal. For order to be maintained, <em>someone<\/em> must know. Thus, the family member who accepts the possible lie is helping the police save face. <\/p>\n<p>I should revise my list then: a true signal is better than no signal which is better than a false signal which is better than no signal is possible. <\/p>\n<p>Nothing is worse than the possibility that something is unknowable. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I spent a few minutes this afternoon trying to figure out if there is ever an instance where a false signal is better than no signal at all. I couldn&#8217;t think of any. (I asked Ana, and she couldn&#8217;t either. In fact, she&#8217;s been waiting all week for a call from a prospective employer and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}