{"id":4919,"date":"2011-03-26T21:35:03","date_gmt":"2011-03-27T04:35:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/josemarquez.com\/xsml\/?p=4919"},"modified":"2011-03-26T21:35:03","modified_gmt":"2011-03-27T04:35:03","slug":"whats-so-vulgar-about-the-hangover-not-nearly-enough","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/2011\/03\/26\/whats-so-vulgar-about-the-hangover-not-nearly-enough\/","title":{"rendered":"What&#8217;s so vulgar about The Hangover? Not nearly enough."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I remember exactly where I was when I read the obituary for the music industry on the front page of the Wall Street Journal: it was a gray and cold morning in March of 2002 and I was standing in line to get a coffee at the Atlas Cafe in San Francisco. <\/p>\n<p>While <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.mattgoyer.com\/stories\/2002\/02\/21\/popSingerFailsToStrikeAChordDespiteTheMillionsSpentByMCA.html\">the report<\/a> noted that there were many contributing causes it also suggested the main cause of death was a flawed risk model: record companies were spending huge sums on just a few albums in the hopes that these big bets would hit jackpot. Unfortunately for all involved, the labels were picking the wrong albums \u2013  perhaps, and ironically so, out of <a href=\"http:\/\/josemarquez.com\/xsml\/archives\/723\">disdain<\/a> for popular tastes. <\/p>\n<p>This past week, I watched two movies at home: <em>The Hangover<\/em>, a seemingly vulgar yet entirely anodyne comedy from 2009 and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jeremiah_Johnson_(film)\">Jeremiah Johnson<\/a>, a potentially treacly yet startlingly ruthless western from 1972. Where the former attempts at being for the people while mocking their intelligence, the latter, despite its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_films_with_overtures\">high-brow tendencies<\/a>, is as blunt and dangerous as a rioting mob. <\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>(Yes, the former was <a href=\"http:\/\/boxofficemojo.com\/movies\/?id=hangover.htm\">a huge hit<\/a> at the box offices, delivering a margin of +690% in just six months. But, then, so <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boxofficereport.com\/database\/1972.shtml\">was<\/a> the latter, with a return of 530% in its nine month run with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tcm.com\/this-month\/article\/72478%7C0\/Jeremiah-Johnson.html\">reportedly<\/a> little promotion.)<\/p>\n<p>For all its bluster, <em>The Hangover<\/em> works hard to be inoffensive. It borrows the famously amoral Mike Tyson only to deem him a &#8220;good guy&#8221;. Figuratively and literally, it invokes the heavily advertised myth of Las Vegas as a place where sins can be expurgated: what happens in Vegas <em>stays<\/em> in Vegas. No harm, no foul. <\/p>\n<p>The main trickster in the movie \u2013\u00a0the white rabbit we follow down a Rohypnol hole \u2013\u00a0is written as a hapless dimwit. At every turn, the movie offers nervous laughs that indulge the most disingenuous strains in American society.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a different story altogether after pretty boy Robert Redford steps into a golden, sunlit frame at the start of <em>Jeremiah Johnson<\/em> to an uptempo country score that welcomes us to the great American frontier. <\/p>\n<p>Within 10 minutes, the titular hero (a returning war vet, no less), has lost his nerve and is on the verge of starving to death. After awkwardly prying a rifle out of a dead hunter&#8217;s frozen hands, Johnson exclaims with joy at the quality of the weapon he has come to possess. The grim moment is played for laughs. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s only the first of many scenes that prompt a sympathetic audience to become complicit in transgression \u2013\u00a0without the relief of a happy ending. (The movie&#8217;s denouement is a slow, maddening and relentless killing spree that begins when Johnson desecrates a Crow burial ground in order to save a group of stranded pilgrims.) <\/p>\n<p>Along the way, Johnson &#8220;befriends&#8221; two fellow loners (sociopaths, really) who speak almost entirely in nasty jokes. In an alternate dimension, the three of them visit Vegas for a weekend of mayhem. <\/p>\n<p>I contrast the two movies because they were both made with the same goal: to sell as many tickets as possible. One makes a show of being in bad taste\u00a0while, in fact, being entirely decorous. The other, despite its formal polish, almost certainly intends to shock. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the movie industry will follow in the steps of the record industry (off a cliff) but I suspect if it does it will be guided by a fear of its audiences&#8217; tastes, especially their taboos and forbidden pleasures. For as much as audiences wish to be cajoled, they also enjoy being disturbed. <\/p>\n<p><strong>postscript<\/strong><br \/>\nIt&#8217;s not by chance that <em>The Hangover<\/em> is framed around a collective &#8220;blackout&#8221;, such is the desire to avoid direct confrontation with the debauchery it supposedly abets. By contrast, <em>Jeremiah Johnson<\/em> deliberately revisits moments in the conquest of the American West largely repressed in mid-20th century myth-making. (I suspect the team developing &#8220;Blood Meridian&#8221; have it as a reference.)<\/p>\n<p>Also of note: members of the cast of <em>The Hangover 2<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?client=safari&#038;rls=en&#038;q=mel+gibson+hangover+2&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8\">reportedly<\/a> refused to work with Mel Gibson who was ultimately dropped from the picture. Gibson is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/hollywood\/features\/2011\/03\/mel-gibson-201103\">apparently<\/a> a horrible person. However, as far as I know, he does not have <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/asia-pacific\/4871610.stm\">a tattoo<\/a> of a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1989\/02\/07\/world\/legacy-of-mao-called-great-disaster.html\">genocidal<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/10\/23\/books\/review\/23cover.html\">killer<\/a> on his arm. Nor has he been convicted of rape, yet. <em>De gustibus non est disputandum.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I remember exactly where I was when I read the obituary for the music industry on the front page of the Wall Street Journal: it was a gray and cold morning in March of 2002 and I was standing in line to get a coffee at the Atlas Cafe in San Francisco. While the report&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4919"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4919\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.josemarquez.com\/etc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}